The skepticism is warranted if you ever feel uneasy about a statistic or claim that seems too good to be true. Companies using misleading statistics in advertising to manipulate consumer choices and perceptions is a massive problem.
Like many others, these brands realize that presenting their products in the best light possible is a great way to increase consumer confidence and sales. However, they go about it deceptively, and many consumers fall for it because they are not aware of the techniques advertisers use to manipulate data.
This article covers the most common types of misleading statistics in advertising and how to spot them quickly.
Cherry-picking is the selective presentation of data, showcasing supporting information only in a particular narrative while conveniently ignoring or downplaying unsupportive stats.
This causes a skewed view of reality, often leading consumers to overstate a product's benefits or effectiveness. For example, a company can claim its software solution has a 5-star rating on Trust Pilot, conveniently neglecting to mention the hundreds of 1-star reviews.
You can do any of the following to spot the cherry-picking technique.
This involves using small or unrepresentative samples to make general claims that significantly skew data in the company’s favor.
For example, a massive skincare brand might claim that 99% of its users improved their skin tone without mentioning the study only involved ten customers. This makes the product appear more impressive than it is in actuality.
Here’s how to spot sample size misrepresentation.
Vague or ambiguous language can cloud real meaning. This makes it difficult to understand the real value or efficacy of the product or service. For example, using "clinically proven" without sharing what the product is clinically proven to do and details about the clinical trial.
To spot this manipulative tactic, consider the following.
This is when a company alters or misrepresents visual data to create false impressions of the product's advantages or performance. For example, a pie chart can have numbers that don’t add up to 100 percent. Similarly, a company can use 3D charts to hide something or make their graph pop.
Some ways to spot such misleading statistics in advertising are as follows.
Distrust among consumers increases as more people get hurt by deceptive advertising, which isn’t good. It has led to a demand for more openness, spurring the emergence of various advertising regulating bodies committed to ensuring consumers receive truthful and accurate product information.
Some of the most popular regulators include the following.
As America's watchdog for consumer rights, the FTC can pursue companies engaging in false advertising. This includes those employing deceptive tactics like adding misleading statistics in advertising materials.
The commission actively inspects ads and initiates action against businesses found making untrue or unsupported claims. Consumer rights organizations frequently collaborate with the FTC to address consumer interests and catch deceptive advertising methods.
Anyone can report misleading claims to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov or their state attorney general consumer protection website.
The ASA oversees advertising across various media outlets. Its mission is to ensure ads are lawful, respectful, and transparent, focusing mainly on accurate statistics.
They actively scrutinize advertisements to ensure they meet their specific guidelines. Consumers can file a complaint on the dedicated complaints page for ASA and its sister organization, The Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP).
Independent reviews are evaluations carried out by either neutral experts or everyday users. They evaluate products on various factors, including functionality, quality, longevity, and overall worth.
These assessments are crucial for informing potential buyers about the positives and negatives of a particular product, enabling more informed purchase decisions.
Here are some great independent review platforms.
While these platforms strive for impartiality, it's wise to consult multiple sources when evaluating claims or anything you suspect is misleading. That way, you’ll have a well-rounded view of the business or product.
A consumer protection organization (or consumer watchdog group) is a body that observes and assesses business conduct, products, and services to defend consumer interests — and promote honesty and fairness.
These organizations carefully examine statements and methods, looking for misleading statistics in advertising to hold corporations accountable and educate the public about risk.
Some of the prominent consumer protection organizations include the following.
Data manipulation in advertising is a universal issue, but certain industries are more prone to such practices, notably the following.
Here are some real-world case studies.
Tobacco brands have downplayed the harmful effects of smoking for decades, dating back to the mid-20th century. For example, they commissioned a research committee in the 1950s to create industry-sponsored research to downplay the link between smoking and cancer.
While scientists criticized the commissioned research, it created enough doubt in consumers to allow the tobacco industry to continue business as usual. A Public Health Chronicles publication exposed the industry's plans to stimulate controversy (see below).
The food and beverage sector frequently employs skewed statistics to make untrue claims about their products. For example, 5-hour Energy claimed its drink shots were recommended by doctors and more effective than coffee. However, those claims were deceptive, violating the state Consumer Protection Act.
The makers of 5-Hour Energy paid $4.3 million in penalties and fees.
Regulatory bodies like the FDA continue to crack down on misleading health claims, but companies in this sector often find new ways to deceive unnoticed.
The weight loss industry is notorious for misleading statistics. Companies often products market products with outrageous claims like "lose 20 pounds in 10 days," supported by small, short-term studies that are not representative.
Sometimes, these claims are even backed by "doctor-recommended" stamps, where recommending physicians are paid spokespeople.
For example, Sensa claimed its weight-loss product’s powdered additive (sprinkled on food) enhanced food smell and taste, making consumers feel full and eat less.
This unfounded weight-loss claim led to huge company losses when the FTC forced them to pay $26.5 million as a settlement. FTC charges also included failing to disclose paid customer endorsement.
Gerber claimed its Good Start Gentle formula prevented children who took it from developing allergies, which could have significant consequences for kids. This unsubstantiated claim got it in hot water with the FTC.
Fortunately, the company settled the lawsuit with the FTC by agreeing not to make or imply any similar claims for the product.
Knowing about case studies like these can provide consumers and business executives with invaluable insights.
Regulatory bodies play a crucial role in setting and enforcing standards. Their proactive involvement is necessary for holding companies accountable and protecting consumers from false claims.
However, awareness is the first step in combating misleading statistics in advertising. The more consumers are aware, the less effective the tactics of manipulators.
In addition, it's not worth it for companies to use disingenuous statistics or data in advertising. It erodes consumer trust, which is critical for any brand's longevity. And once trust is compromised, regaining it is a steep uphill battle, often requiring substantial financial and reputational investments.
Ultimately, the onus is on consumers to be vigilant and advertisers to maintain ethical standards.
Unlock hidden ads revenue with our 3-step creative process
JC Digital helps consumer start-ups generate 3x revenue growth with a brand performance marketing approach.
Schedule a free consultation today!
I'd like to learn more